18
knowledg. Eoit "whywould anyone want to give &icecera" Usip forward... What fundamental m> 1) Bible as jigsaw puzzle 2) "essen aism" is a specific Idld di cpate fro allt iems the
Bible truth 3) neglect of culture 4) self-conf.. bord on hubris 5) apocalypic (127). Is M. a fund? DA> Q.-- Novelt
whats so great iabout intellectualsm? Soz as opp to Peretti.. soz believed the line of good & evil runs through the eheart of every indiviual (140) Pereti depiced secular as evil vers Chr as good (140) William Jennings Bryan.. opp of abs principles witha fervent appeal to millenial Poss (159) Murphys Arm
observ. "Those who dont learn from the past are condemned to write endtimes book" (174) Baconian Seclor good
Science 1) no spec w/o emp proof 2) empirca evidnce (197) opinion rasises relvant topics, & awareness..relatively balnaced., ionce again, however labelling can be dangerous.. Mouw 'concerns for transnational norms of justice rootd in the great acts of salvation Hist. has added a thoughtful new element to evang pol life (224) urges ecumenc politeness. to learn from each other (246).. addatance from God in Wasteleand..how to resist modernity "additicont to modernity can be resisted by a strong and passionate mind that his beend shaped by God's word fo truth, need infused with d snse of what is right (119)0 Churrch identify identity vanishes when transcendence melts into immanence where theocentric faith be anthropocentire (122) what happened? a long serious of power revivials sought to produce dep exp of the God within but all too often ignored the o/s God (129) 4 pots for doctrine prmtrs.. 1st trinity comps are = 2nd Father son equality 3rd incarnation --we know God only through Jesus 4th respect the rship btw what God has revealed and hwhat he has kept hidden Paul declares that fallen huamn nature sis hostile to God (134) Holiness of God (138) Church summcccumbed...relationaover moral mysticsm our conviction self over surrender.. self imag over character (give evidence) God's holiness 1) demands exclusive loylty.. 2) god alone is holy "in his holiness God is not something to be trifled with, familiarty brred s contemp.. More wo holiness grace s not grace, faith is meaningless, sin merelyfailure (144) Stephen Carter spration of relig state was meant to protect rel frdm relig fromthe state not vice versa... Doctrine of Providence assets" God's control over all life evens 9-25-96 CNV... certainty of God vers talking of God DOooyerwerd re that theolgy is only a science like the others.. (i.e. faith is not equal to theolgy..id e dont let theolgy steal your soul..whateger yer profession, integrate thining Chris into profession..the problem science demands veriifcation, theolgy cannot necc. Tillic a secular theolgy..Kyuyper does not follow Dooyewedr
Dart let, Theology the I your
57
Peretti
•Exclusive LOYALTY steph.
Carter hurcht,
Sep of
Intended
Protect
State
CHURCH
God still SPEAKS
Cal Sem
schliermahcer..theolgy relates to revelation theolgy at university..Dooyewerd faith theolgy is science of faith..Foppe Ten Hoor --opposes Kuyper..prior to fall Is shad capacity to think godly...after fall, knowledge of world is not equal to knowldge of God, knowledge of GOd is given by GOd thus theolgy vs cosmology..insistts that CHr afaith stands or falls on knowledge fo God. Bible church..thus theolgy at seminary Bolt equivocates on his position..Calvin College needs to be truth to both Kupyper and Ten Hoor..Barth "Nein" rejects the six cretria he gives his own criteriall.. Brunner point of contact btw divine & of human natuer (would this be closer to pan-entheism) // evaluation "barth is correct in repudinting natural
Brunne is CO
heolgy hi renet in positing th relaity fo antural revlation..Barth is too direct nce 2) use science to support 3) the real issue theolgy -- froma ove...Bolts' concerns cl)demystify scie ipp dogmaties is the scientifi self-ex of the Chr universal or unique "grace" barths' defn.. "as a theol use church with respect to the content of its distntinctve talk about thoughts" modern sickness wont accpt anything w/o reason..." How then do we knw" through narrative before worldview..thus theolgy today is posible be God stillspeaks (know our family hist the CHr story..) then cries out fro e III relation btween Bib dog and Bib theology.. theol sticks up tsticks to the Bib canon....dogmatics goes beyond the canon of scr.. CNB new Ho L7.. Method options leductive v inductive a priori v aposte cior.. Deducitve --tends to summarize the CHr faith though the parf. tilter (i.e. lib theok, justif by faith, etc) Inducitve "true method" factrs laws mind..synthetic method starting point is God, considers eeverything in light of GOd, treat each other in logical order, and ever..s 'ruth must be judged byt he prev accepted turth... Orrs these "far too neat" bolt says.. aone could argue that hte way the doctrines unfolder were not necessarily the perfect way.. Varietes of Orders, Orr, Berkhof, Aw, Calvin, Barth Berkhf.. Spykman, Erickosn.. Cal sem adheres to Berkhofs method.. (a condensation of Bavicnk) class discussion of Noll.., self-evident. anti-intell.. promiseds reford tread for avoiding evang strains and has hist. tradition coming from Europe... Are Reformed evang? Gamble --anti-kuuyperian, Bolt --pro-kuyperian... CNB 10-2-96- -knowledge of God.revelation...how to talk about Rvitn. with, this with have no God Ex Kierkegaard, mainden parable.i.e. God comes into our existance incognito..Promise at CR of rvltn.. Bavinck "I willbe thy God' Three attacks on rvltn.. Deism--reason, Kant --God unknowable Hegel ---Hist.. Six objections 11) agn. 2) modern Epist. 3) modern Psych 4) Bib crit 5) comp rign 6) crit sociol.. Summary a) Bible is imperialistic....
BERICHOF God
Incognito
Bible is demannding.. Bib trms fr Rv Prots of rule Varfield a) they b) prophecy (what entails Of Holy Spirit Boit proposes imagination....
Foppe
Ten Noor BARTH NEIN`
Re NAJURAL
THEOLOGY
Here’s your material shaped into a flowing theological narrative, unified in tone and rhythm while keeping all your core content and references intact:
Flowing Narrative: Knowledge, Revelation, and the Challenge of Theology
This section considers the enduring question of how Christians can truly know God—how divine knowledge becomes accessible to human understanding—and explores the dynamic interplay between Scripture, theology, culture, and intellect. It wrestles with the challenges facing modern evangelical thought: the tension between maintaining intellectual rigor and nurturing authentic spirituality.
Within evangelical scholarship, this tension has produced both vibrant creativity and deep anxiety. Figures such as Soz, Peretti, William Jennings Bryan, and Richard Mouw illustrate differing approaches to morality and cultural engagement. Soz points inward, to the moral struggle within the self—the constant discernment of good and evil in the heart. Peretti, by contrast, dramatizes a stark division between the secular and the sacred, portraying a world where spiritual conflict defines every human choice. Bryan’s millennial visions, framed within early twentieth-century optimism, reveal how theology can project cultural fears and hopes into apocalyptic narratives. Murphy’s observations reinforce this tendency: Christian imagination often maps the crises of its own age onto cosmic frameworks, reading history as spiritual warfare played out on a global stage.
From this cultural and moral foundation, the discussion moves into epistemology and revelation—the question of how human beings come to know God at all. Knowledge of God, the writers insist, is not merely an intellectual pursuit but a spiritual posture shaped by obedience, Scripture, and the life of the church. Within this conversation, Foppe Ten Hoor, Abraham Kuyper, Karl Barth, Emil Brunner, John Bolt, and Louis Berkhof offer distinct but overlapping perspectives on the relationship between divine revelation and human reason.
For Ten Hoor and Kuyper, humanity after the Fall can know God only through divine initiative; revelation comes from God alone, not from observation of the world. In contrast, Barth categorically rejects all forms of natural theology—the attempt to infer divine truth from nature or human reason—arguing that God is known solely through the revelation of His Word in Christ. Brunner, while agreeing that revelation is primary, nonetheless seeks a “point of contact” between the divine and human, affirming that the image of God in humanity provides some capacity for response. Bolt enters this dialogue seeking balance: affirming the legitimate insights of science while guarding theology against reductionism. For him, genuine knowledge of God requires critical engagement with modern thought without surrendering the mystery of revelation.
The section then explores theological method, the way theology seeks coherence and understanding. Deductive methods tend to begin with established doctrines and organize faith logically within comprehensive systems—characteristic of much classical and liberal theology. Inductive methods, however, begin with God’s revelation itself and interpret the world in light of that revelation, allowing Scripture to guide rather than merely confirm human reasoning. Both methods confront the same tension: how to remain faithful to the historical narrative of salvation while maintaining intellectual coherence. Theology, therefore, becomes a discipline of disciplined imagination—rooted in revelation but responsive to the questions of history and culture.
The final portion addresses the various attacks on revelation that have emerged across intellectual history. From the detached rationalism of Deism to the critical philosophy of Kant, from Hegel’s dialectical idealism to the psychological and sociological critiques of modernity, each movement challenges the claim that God reveals Himself directly to humanity. Modern biblical criticism and secular epistemology have often attempted to domesticate revelation, treating Scripture as a human artifact rather than divine address. Yet, as Bolt reminds us, the Bible resists such domestication: it is a demanding and even “imperial” text, confronting the reader with a call to obedience, not mere analysis.
To engage Scripture faithfully, theology must bring together both intellectual precision and imaginative depth. The imagination allows faith to perceive what reason alone cannot grasp—the living presence of God within the world’s brokenness. Revelation, therefore, is not a static deposit of information but an ongoing encounter: divine truth breaking into human history, summoning believers to think deeply, live faithfully, and interpret courageously in the face of modern doubt.
Would you like me to continue formatting these sections in this narrative-theological style for the next topics too (e.g., “17 – The Doctrine of Revelation in Scripture,” etc.) so that they read seamlessly as a unified study series?
Here’s Section 18 in our narrative/notes/key terms/unable-to-decipher format, expanded for clarity:
18 – Knowledge, Revelation, and the Challenge of Theology
Narrative Summary
This section explores how Christians can know God, focusing on the interplay between scripture, theology, culture, and intellect. It addresses fundamental critiques of evangelical intellectualism, methods of theological reasoning, and the limits of natural theology.
Evangelical scholarship grapples with the tension between intellectual rigor and spiritual authenticity. Authors like Soz, Peretti, William Jennings Bryan, and Mouw are cited in discussions about morality, the line between good and evil, and cultural engagement. Soz emphasizes the internal moral struggle, while Peretti represents the stark dichotomy of secular vs. Christian good. Historical examples, such as Bryan’s millennial appeals and Murphy’s observations, underscore the tendency to project contemporary culture into apocalyptic frameworks.
The section moves into epistemology and revelation: how humans gain knowledge of God, the role of obedience, scripture, and church tradition, and how natural theology contrasts with revealed theology. Foppe Ten Hoor, Kuyper, Barth, Brunner, Bolt, and Berkhof offer differing models:
-
Ten Hoor/Kuyper: post-fall knowledge of God comes exclusively from God, not the world.
-
Barth: rejects natural theology, emphasizing revelation over human reason.
-
Brunner: seeks a point of contact between divine and human nature.
-
Bolt: balances demystifying science with preserving theological integrity.
Theological method is addressed in detail:
-
Deductive approaches summarize faith through doctrinal frameworks (e.g., liberal theology).
-
Inductive approaches start from God and examine all things in light of divine revelation.
-
Both approaches wrestle with the tension between logical coherence and historical narrative.
The section concludes with attacks on revelation (Deism, Kant, Hegel, modern epistemology, psychology, biblical criticism, sociological critique), emphasizing the demanding and imperialistic nature of the Bible, and the necessity of imagination and interpretive rigor in theology.
Here’s a cleaned-up “Notes & Observations – 18” version in readable form, keeping it structured and faithful to your original observations, without converting it into key terms or a flowing narrative:
Notes & Observations – 18
-
Knowledge & Intellectualism:
-
Questions the value of intellectualism and its limits in spiritual understanding.
-
Soz contrasts secular and Christian moral lines; secular often seen as evil, Christian as good.
-
Past events and human experience are crucial; those ignoring history risk repeating mistakes (e.g., end-times writing).
-
-
Bible & Doctrine:
-
Bible is complex—can resemble a jigsaw puzzle.
-
Dangers of “essentialism,” neglecting culture, or overconfidence bordering on hubris.
-
Apocalyptic emphasis present but must be tempered with cultural understanding.
-
Four pillars for doctrine: Trinity, Father–Son equality, incarnation, and respecting the revealed vs. hidden aspects of God.
-
-
Church & Holiness:
-
Church identity diminishes when transcendence is lost and faith becomes anthropocentric.
-
God’s holiness demands exclusive loyalty; grace and faith are meaningful only when understood in context of God’s holiness.
-
The danger of moral mysticism: prioritizing self-image over character and surrender.
-
-
Science & Theology:
-
Science emphasizes empirical proof and observation; theology cannot always demand verification.
-
Bolt cautions against letting scientific data overshadow biblical revelation.
-
Theology vs. cosmology: knowledge of God comes from God, not human observation.
-
-
Revelation & Divine Knowledge:
-
God still speaks through history, narrative, and human experience.
-
Bolt emphasizes narrative before worldview; understanding family and church history aids comprehension of God’s revelation.
-
Three modern attacks on revelation: Deism (reason), Kant (unknowable God), Hegel (history).
-
-
Method & Hermeneutics:
-
Methods: deductive (summarizing faith) vs. inductive (facts and laws of mind).
-
Synthetic methods (e.g., Berkhof) start with God as the ultimate reference point, evaluating truth against pre-accepted divine truths.
-
Bolt notes that unfolding doctrines may not align perfectly with historical order but must retain coherence.
-
-
Key Figures & Influences:
-
Barth rejects natural theology (“Nein”) and emphasizes divine revelation.
-
Ten Hoor: post-fall humans cannot know God independently; knowledge of God is divinely given.
-
Bavinck: God comes incognito, entering human existence in revelation.
-
Noll, Spykman, Erickson, Calvin College faculty influence theological method, debate between Kuyperian and anti-Kuyperian approaches.
-
-
Conclusion:
-
Revelation, church doctrine, and biblical interpretation must balance intellectual rigor with acknowledgment of divine mystery.
-
Theology integrates faith and thought but does not replace personal devotion or obedience.
-
If you want, I can also reformat 20 in the same structured “Notes & Observations” style so that all three (18, 19, 20) are consistent and readable. This would make it much easier to review later. Do you want me to do that?
Notes
1. Fundamental Problems in Evangelical Intellectualism
-
Overemphasis on the Bible as a jigsaw puzzle or rigid literalism.
-
Essentialism that isolates items from their context; neglects culture.
-
Hubris or overconfidence; apocalyptic tendencies.
-
Soz: line of good and evil resides in every individual, not a simple secular/Christian binary.
-
Cultural engagement: Mouw urges awareness of transnational justice, ecumenical politeness, learning from history.
2. Knowledge of God
-
Pre- and post-fall distinctions: knowledge of the world ≠ knowledge of God.
-
Revelation is God’s gift, not a product of human intellect alone.
-
Theology cannot be verified like science; faith is prioritized over empirical proof.
-
Bible, church, and narrative history are primary loci for understanding revelation.
3. Methodology in Theology
-
Deductive: starts from doctrinal truths, logical summaries.
-
Inductive: starts from God, considers facts in light of divine revelation.
-
Synthetic: balances doctrinal coherence with historical and practical realities.
-
Key figures: Berkhof, Bavinck, Orr, Spykman, Erickson.
4. Revelation
-
God can be incognito in human experience (Kierkegaard).
-
Three attacks on revelation: Deism, Kantian unknowability, Hegelian historicism.
-
Six objections: agnosticism, modern epistemology, psychology, biblical criticism, comparative religion, sociological critique.
-
Imagination and narrative are essential for engaging with scripture authentically.
5. Church and Obedience
-
Church identity fades if transcendence melts into immanence.
-
Holiness of God demands exclusive loyalty; God alone is holy.
-
Faith, grace, and obedience cannot be separated from moral character and awareness of sin.
Key Terms
-
Incognito Revelation: God enters human experience subtly, often unnoticed.
-
Exclusive Loyalty: God demands singular devotion, above cultural or institutional pressures.
-
Deductive vs. Inductive Theology: contrasting methods for deriving or applying doctrinal truth.
-
Synthetic Method: integrates historical, narrative, and doctrinal insights.
-
Natural vs. Revealed Theology: human reason vs. divine self-disclosure.
-
Apocalyptic Impulse: tendency to interpret history and culture in end-times terms.
-
Transcendence vs. Immanence: balancing God’s otherness with presence in creation.
Here’s a polished, seminary-style set of definitions for your latest Key Terms / Concepts, consistent with your existing glossary:
📘 Key Terms / Concepts
Incognito Revelation
The subtle manner in which God enters human experience, often unnoticed or ordinary, revealing divine presence in hidden, everyday, or marginalized contexts. This underscores that God’s work is not always spectacular but pervasive and relational.Exclusive Loyalty
The biblical demand that God receives singular devotion above all cultural, institutional, or personal allegiances. True faith prioritizes obedience to God over conformity to societal norms or human authority (Deut. 6:5; Matt. 6:24).Deductive vs. Inductive Theology
-
Deductive Theology – Begins with general doctrines or principles and applies them to particular situations.
-
Inductive Theology – Begins with specific scriptural texts, historical events, or lived experience and derives general theological insight.
Both methods complement each other in rigorous theological reflection.
Synthetic Method
A holistic approach that integrates historical analysis, narrative understanding, and doctrinal insight. The synthetic method seeks coherence without reductionism, uniting Scripture, tradition, and context into a unified theological perspective.Natural vs. Revealed Theology
-
Natural Theology – Knowledge of God derived through human reason, observation of creation, and moral reflection.
-
Revealed Theology – Knowledge of God communicated through divine self-disclosure in Scripture, Christ, and the Spirit.
Christian theology often synthesizes both, recognizing the limits of reason while affirming God’s self-revelation.
Apocalyptic Impulse
The interpretive tendency to understand history, culture, and personal events in light of eschatological fulfillment. This impulse emphasizes God’s ultimate sovereignty, cosmic justice, and the hope of divine transformation at the end of time.Transcendence vs. Immanence
The theological balance between God’s otherness and incomprehensibility (transcendence) and God’s presence, involvement, and relational closeness within creation (immanence). Both attributes are essential for a robust understanding of divine action and engagement with the world.-
Unable to Decipher / Tentative
-
Some shorthand and references remain unclear: “Eoit ‘why would anyone want to give &icecera’”, DA> Q.-- Novelt, Murphys Arm observ., CNB new Ho L7.
-
References to page numbers, lecture dates, or shorthand (e.g., 9-25-96 CNV, 57, 127, 140) require contextual verification.
-
Some author positions (e.g., Bolt’s equivocation, Brunner’s “CO”) need further elaboration from source materials.
If you want, I can now integrate Sections 14–18 into a single, coherent, annotated summary, clarifying all authors, methods, and key critiques while keeping your narrative and notes intact. This would produce a continuous study guide from your lecture notes.
Do you want me to do that next?
No comments:
Post a Comment